This is the mail archive of the
xsl-list@mulberrytech.com
mailing list .
RE: Re: RE: What is the correct behaviour of vendor:node-set($x) when x is empty?
- From: "Oleg Tkachenko" <olegt at multiconn dot com>
- To: <xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com>
- Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2002 22:37:40 +0200
- Subject: RE: [xsl] Re: RE: What is the correct behaviour of vendor:node-set($x) when x is empty?
- Reply-to: xsl-list at lists dot mulberrytech dot com
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com
> [mailto:owner-xsl-list@lists.mulberrytech.com]On Behalf Of
> Dimitre Novatchev
> Therefore, would it be possible, ***please***, to produce a short,
> one-paragraph specification for vendor:node-set(), which says that it
> should also accept node-sets, including the empty one?
>
> I regard this as a "mini-EXSLT", just covering the
> vendor:node-set() function, which is a de-facto standard, but appears
> to lack a specification...
Yes, I think it would be extremly useful but how could we force xslt implementors to adhere that spec?
Anyway such kind of community-approved spec would be much better than nothing.
---
Oleg Tkachenko,
Multiconn International, Israel
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list