This is the mail archive of the
binutils@sources.redhat.com
mailing list for the binutils project.
Re: use MIPS NewABI register names when disassembling NewABI code
- From: Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
- To: Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com>
- Cc: cgd at broadcom dot com, gdb-patches at sources dot redhat dot com, binutils at sources dot redhat dot com
- Date: 11 Apr 2003 21:31:01 -0300
- Subject: Re: use MIPS NewABI register names when disassembling NewABI code
- Organization: GCC Team, Red Hat
- References: <orel4diutd.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><3E927BCA.1080702@redhat.com><oru1d9ci9a.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><3E93391F.2050005@redhat.com><or1y0cbag7.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><3E94339A.8030405@redhat.com><ord6jtd1y2.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><mailpost.1050039798.9718@news-sj1-1> <yov5brzdo9k2.fsf@broadcom.com><orznmxbhlm.fsf@free.redhat.lsd.ic.unicamp.br><3E96D9DC.5080508@redhat.com>
On Apr 11, 2003, Andrew Cagney <ac131313 at redhat dot com> wrote:
> Anything with the word `new' in it should set of alarm bells. "New"
> (in edit case) doublely so :-)
Well, that's in the name of the ABI, unfortunately.
>> Index: gdb/ChangeLog
>> from Alexandre Oliva <aoliva at redhat dot com>
>> * Makefile.in (libbfd_h): Added missing setting.
> Obvious, thanks (Is the use of libbfd.h permitted though?).
I don't see why not.
>> * mips-tdep.c (mips_gdbarch_init): Set disassembler_options
>> according to the selected ABI.
> Yes!!
Wheee! At last! Thanks for shepherding me through the whole process
:-)
> Can you please create a bug report
> (http://www.gnu.org/software/gdb/bugs/, pointing out that the MIPS
> needs a ``set mips disassembler' command.
Done.
--
Alexandre Oliva Enjoy Guarana', see http://www.ic.unicamp.br/~oliva/
Red Hat GCC Developer aoliva at {redhat dot com, gcc.gnu.org}
CS PhD student at IC-Unicamp oliva at {lsd dot ic dot unicamp dot br, gnu.org}
Free Software Evangelist Professional serial bug killer